(e) by the tenants themselves as joint tenants or conceptually in a joint lease agreement, the parties are united in their possession, interests, title, time and intent. In comparison, for a joint lease, the only unit needed between the parties is the unit of ownership. These are just examples. Owners can do whatever they want, regardless of why they buy the property together. It is also possible that a 50% share of a property is owned “jointly” by two or more companies. For example, if a couple has invested equally in a property with a business partner, they could own the property as a tenant with the business partner who owns 50% and the couple 50%. The couple could hold their 50% stake as Joint Tenants. Thus, if one of them passed, the other would automatically receive the total 50% share, but if the surviving spouse resisted later, his share would go into their estate. The most common uses – investors, friends, unmarried couples who jointly own the property. The concept of joint lease is rooted in historical principles of ownership that were first developed in English law and then taken up in Canadian law.
In practice, the exact rights and obligations related to a tenant`s community are somewhat outdated and perhaps offer less protection than might be expected. 5. For further discussion on independent companies, see Rob Desbarats, Jay Todesco and Kate Royer, “Risk Commissions in Joint Operating Agreements for Oil and Gas Development” (2016), Alta L Rev at 417, available online: www.albertalawreview.com/index. php/ALR/article/view/472/464. Not all co-owners always agree to separate the lease. The owner of the severance pay must prohibit the opposing co-owners from intending to separate the joint lease. This is a transfer from the property to himself as a common tenant. The co-owner must provide the Land Titles Office with a certificate of performance on the opposing co-owners. The land titles then issue a new title that reflects the ownership of the co-owners as common tenants. (b) all joint tenants, with the exception of those who carry out the transfer, give their written consent to the transfer, or the unit of time refers to the fact that the joint lease for both parties began and ended simultaneously. Unit ownership means that the interest in the property for both parties has been derived from the same instrument, whether it is a will or another transfer.
In comparison, for a joint lease, each party could acquire the property by different owners at different times. (d) from a person who holds the property as a common tenant to that person as a common tenant, the joint tenancy relationship may also be separated by mutual agreement or trade; the aim is to analyse the situation and determine whether the parties intended to dissolve the joint lease by their shares. If the parties move away from thinking about their collective interest and thinking about their individual shares in the property, this is an indicator that they are treating their property as a common lease. . . .